In the wake of the tragic fire at Le Constellation that claimed 41 lives, a craftsman alleges that the owners opted against a fire-retardant foam due to budget constraints.
A recent tragic fire at the Le Constellation venue in Crans-Montana during New Year's Eve resulted in the loss of 41 lives. In the aftermath, a critical signal was sent to investigators by Robert Borbiro, a craftsman who worked on the venue's furnishings in 2016. His communication details how he suggested applying a fire-retardant foam to the establishment but claims that the owners, the Moretti couple, rejected this safety measure citing economic reasons. This revelation adds grave implications to the ongoing investigation as it suggests negligence and a prioritization of cost over safety.
In his correspondence to Swiss authorities, Borbiro explicitly stated, "I suggested a complete fire-retardant coating, but the option was rejected for budgetary constraints." This decision raises immediate concerns about the structural safety measures of the venue, as reducing costs may have directly contributed to the devastating outcome of the fire. Borbiro's claims signal a troubling trend where financial considerations override necessary safety protocols, thus placing patrons at risk.
As investigators delve deeper into the circumstances surrounding the fire, Borbiro's testimony could become pivotal in determining liability. If it's proven that the Morettis intentionally dismissed vital safety recommendations, it could lead to serious legal repercussions. The event not only highlights a local tragedy but raises broader questions about fire safety regulations, financial ethics in business operations, and accountability in the hospitality industry.
