In a ruling by the Oslo District Court, it has been decided that both Dagbladet and Aftenposten will retain their accreditation to cover the ongoing trial against Marius Borg Høiby. This decision comes after the two news outlets faced scrutiny for recent breaches of the court’s prohibition on photography during the proceedings. The breaches included unauthorized photos taken by Dagbladet’s commentator and Aftenposten’s photographer, which involved images taken during critical moments of the trial.

The court evaluated the context of these violations before determining that allowing the newspapers to maintain their accreditation was in the public interest. The trial has garnered significant media attention given its implications and the celebrity status of the defendant, Marius Borg Høiby, which likely influenced the court's decision to prioritize news reporting over strict enforcement of the photo prohibition in this case. Allowing media access is considered vital for transparency and informing the public about judicial proceedings.

Both newspaper representatives have stated their commitment to adhering to court rules moving forward. This incident highlights the ongoing tension between media coverage and judicial regulations, particularly in high-profile cases that attract substantial public and media interest. The ruling underscores the importance of responsible journalism while emphasizing the courts' understanding of the changing dynamics in media reporting, especially in cases of such public relevance.