The article from FAZ addresses former President Donald Trump's stance on climate policies, pointing out that despite climate activists successfully raising awareness about global warming, they have struggled to convince people to invest financially in climate protection. Trump's administration had a significant impact on climate policy, with his abandonment of numerous regulations intended to combat climate change sparking global concern.

Furthermore, the article details Trump's skepticism regarding the prevailing scientific consensus that human activity is a primary driver of climate change. He posits that the alarmist rhetoric surrounding the climate crisis serves specific economic interests and argues that stringent climate regulations only increase energy costs and hurt the economy without making a significant dent in global emissions. This perspective resonates with a segment of the public that prioritizes economic growth over environmental issues.

The implications of Trump's viewpoint are profound, especially in the context of international climate agreements and the need for collective action. As leaders around the world rally for climate action, the reluctance and dismissal of such policies by influential figures like Trump signal potential setbacks in global efforts to manage climate change effectively. The ongoing debate reflects broader societal divisions over environmental responsibility and economic priorities, which continue to shape policy discussions today.