This article presents an analysis of the clash between Emerald Fennell's film adaptation of Emily Brontë's classic novel and the expectations of its literary fans. The adaptation features Hollywood stars Margot Robbie and Jacob Elordi, which has sparked debates about the film's fidelity to the original book, particularly regarding the character of Heathcliff, who in the novel is described as having dark skin. This portrayal diverges significantly from how Heathcliff is traditionally viewed, and many fans and scholars have expressed their dissatisfaction with this creative choice.

Literature scholar Pajari Räsänen articulates his frustration with the film's adaptation, describing the viewing experience as "agonizing" and indicating that he had avoided other film adaptations for the same reason. Räsänen’s love for the original text is evident as he critiques Fennell's version harshly, questioning the rationale behind altering key aspects of the story that form an integral part of Heathcliff's character and narrative arc. The article funnels the audience's attention to how adaptations can often provoke strong reactions from devoted fans when artistic liberties conflict with established character interpretations.

Fennell, noted for her provocative filmmaking style in earlier works like "Promising Young Woman" and "Saltburn," has previously tackled contemporary themes such as the #MeToo movement and class differences with a sharp and bold sensibility. As this latest adaptation is scrutinized, it underlines the broader implications of adapting classical literature in a modern context, raising questions about authenticity, representation, and the responsibilities of filmmakers in interpreting beloved texts. The responses from audiences and critics around such adaptations reflect a cultural discourse on race, identity, and the reshaping of historical narratives in present-day cinema.