The article discusses the double standards evident among LGBT rights advocates regarding recent comments made by journalist Sigfrido Ranucci. The author highlights how Ranucci's labeling of certain media personalities as part of a 'gay lobby' has been met with silence from these champions of civil rights, contrasting this reaction with their intense scrutiny of critics in the past, particularly by lawmakers like Alessandro Zan, who previously labeled any dissent as homophobic. The essay draws attention to the complexities and contradictions within the ongoing discourse about homophobia and civil rights, particularly as it pertains to left-wing politicians.

The piece further references the history of accusations within the LGBTQ+ context, specifically pointing out how individuals like Zan have heavily criticized and labeled as homophobic anyone who disagreed with their legislative proposals. It notes an instance where Zan accused the right of misogyny and homophobia in 2020. Furthermore, his legal actions against fellow politicians, such as Silvia Sardone, over perceived discriminatory remarks highlight the severity with which these issues have been approached in the past.

Ultimately, the author implies that the current silence from pro-LGBT figures on Ranucci's statements signifies a troubling inconsistency in their advocacy, raising questions about their commitment to the very principles they espouse. This inconsistency not only affects public perceptions of homophobia but also the overall credibility of civil rights campaigning in Italy, especially in a polarized political environment.