Judicial investigations into the Pegasus spyware scandal, targeting Catalan independence movements, have been ongoing for over three years without significant advancement. The inquiries are complicated by a 1968 law designed to protect the activities of Spain's National Intelligence Center (CNI), which has hindered transparency and accountability in the case. Despite testimonies from Esperanza Casteleiro, the current director of the CNI, and her predecessor Paz Esteban, both have cited the Official Secrets Law to limit disclosure of crucial information, leaving many questions unanswered.

The lack of clarity and progress in the cases is exacerbated by the political sensitivities surrounding the use of Pegasus software against prominent Catalan leaders, including former president Pere Aragonès. Both Casteleiro and Esteban have only provided minimal assistance during court appearances, participating mainly via video conference while invoking the secrecy provisions of the law. This situation raises concerns over the balance between national security and the public’s right to know, especially given the implications for civil liberties in Spain.

As the government continues to promise transparency and accountability, the intersection of national security laws with judicial processes presents a significant challenge. The ongoing trials not only reflect the complexities of state surveillance but also highlight the challenges faced by the judiciary in addressing politically charged cases. The outcome of these proceedings could have lasting implications for Spain's legal framework regarding privacy and government oversight, as well as the future of Catalan independence movements.