The U.S. House Judiciary Committee has taken a definitive stance against the South Korean government's actions towards Coupang, interpreting the proposed sanctions as biased efforts to favor local competitors at the expense of American interests. The committee views this as another instance of foreign governments targeting innovative American companies, akin to what has been observed in Europe, and is calling for legislation to protect American businesses from such discriminatory practices. The implication of this investigation potentially leading to legislative action highlights a growing concern about international commercial fairness and equity in competition.

Further, on December 5, Judiciary Committee members issued subpoenas to collect testimony related to the matter before a deposition scheduled for later this month. This legal process allows committee lawyers to gather detailed accounts, bypassing the typically more public congressional hearings. The subpoenas demand the submission of all documents and communications between Coupang and various South Korean government agencies dating back to January 1, 2020, indicating the committee's rigorous approach to ascertain the legality and implications of South Korea's investigative procedures against Coupang.

This situation reflects the broader context of international trade relations and the scrutiny faced by companies like Coupang, highlighting the tensions between national regulatory practices and foreign business operations. As the scrutiny unfolds, it raises significant questions about how much the legal proceedings in one country can impact the operations of businesses abroad, particularly in fast-evolving markets like South Korea's e-commerce sector. The outcome could set a precedent for how similar cases are handled in the future, both domestically within South Korea and internationally between nations.