The favorites of the public, the jury's favorites, and the truth in the middle of an endless party: "It was hunger..., not low blood pressure"
The article discusses the discrepancies between audience choices and jury selections at the Estrella de Mar awards ceremony in Mar del Plata, highlighting a theatrical season filled with contrasting preferences.
This article reflects on the recent Estrella de Mar awards ceremony in Mar del Plata, focusing on the disparities between the public's favorite theatrical performances and those favored by the jury. It notes that the audience's choice can often differ significantly from the awards given, showcasing two perspectives on the theatrical scene this season. The author mentions the spectacle of this event and includes remarks from Ana María Picchio, an actress who missed the celebration because she was eating a small sandwich, emphasizing the celebratory yet chaotic atmosphere of the awards.
The analysis draws on the latest audience statistics from Aadet, the organization that oversees the commercial theater circuit, to illustrate the preference for certain shows like "La cena de los tontos," which has consistently ranked high in ticket sales since the season began. As the season progresses, the article hints at the ongoing debate regarding audience engagement versus artistic merit, raising questions about the criteria used for both audience favorites and jury selections in award contexts.
Ultimately, this divergence in preferences not only highlights the complexity of the theater landscape in Mar del Plata but also invites further discussion on the role and influence of juries in determining prestige through awards. The article suggests that it reflects broader trends in how art is consumed and valued, posing implications for future productions and their reception.