The USA is frighteningly poorly prepared for war in the Arctic, says the author
Kenneth R. Rosen argues that the USA is inadequately prepared for potential military conflict in the Arctic region.
Kenneth R. Rosen, a war journalist and author whose perspectives on Arctic geopolitics have gained traction, asserts that the United States is alarmingly unprepared for military conflicts in the Arctic. His extensive travels across the Arctic, including experiences with the Norwegian and American coast guards and interactions with Swedish soldiers, have positioned him to comment on the strategic and operational shortcomings of the U.S. in this crucial region. Rosen suggests that instead of pursuing aggressive expansions like the acquisition of Greenland, the U.S. should focus on enhancing its security measures in the North.
Rosen's work highlights the complexities of Arctic geopolitics, emphasizing the need for cooperative security strategies. He engaged with various stakeholders, including generals, scientists, and local fishermen, to gather insights about the challenges and opportunities presented by this rapidly changing environment. The perspectives he presents reflect a growing recognition of the Arctic's importance, not just for the countries directly involved, but for global stability as well. His arguments advocate for a shift in American policy that prioritizes preparedness and collaboration.
The implications of Rosen's findings are significant as they challenge current U.S. strategy in relation to Arctic security. As climate change continues to alter the dynamics of the region, increased accessibility will likely lead to heightened military and economic interests from various nations. Rosen's critique serves as a call to action for U.S. policymakers to reassess their approach and develop a more nuanced, cooperative stance regarding Arctic affairs, emphasizing the need for readiness rather than territorial acquisition.