Germany's Federal Constitutional Court has ruled against a lawsuit filed by a Palestinian citizen from Gaza, who sought to challenge the German government's licensing of military exports to Israel. The court upheld a prior decision from a lower court that had already lifted a partial ban on arms exports to Israel, a decision that was favored by the government under Chancellor Friedrich Merz. The lawsuit was backed by the European Centre for Constitutional and Human Rights, which advocated for the plaintiffs based on the military equipment's use in Gaza.

The case had previously been thrown out by lower courts in 2024 and 2025, prompting the Palestinian plaintiff to appeal to the Federal Constitutional Court. However, the court found insufficient evidence to support claims that the previous courts had erred in their judgement or showed arbitrary denial of rights. By rejecting the appeal, the court effectively reaffirmed the legality of arms exports to Israel amid ongoing tensions in the region.

The ruling adds to the ongoing discourse surrounding Germany's arms policy, particularly in the context of its obligations to human rights and international humanitarian law. It sparks heated debate on the balance between supporting strategic alliances and adhering to international principles on arms sales and human rights, especially with respect to the Israel-Palestine conflict. As the situation evolves, this decision could influence further political and legal actions regarding arms exports within Europe and beyond.