Feb 12 โ€ข 19:19 UTC ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Finland Iltalehti

There is a detail in women's clothing that is not in men's clothing - why are the pockets like this?

This article examines the differences between men's and women's clothing pockets, highlighting the historical context and implications of these design choices.

The article from Iltalehti discusses the significant differences found in pockets of women's jeans compared to men's, as revealed by a 2018 study by The Pudding. According to the study, pockets in women's jeans were found to be 48% shorter and 6.6% narrower than those in men's jeans. This discrepancy is attributed to historical customs and current practices in clothing production, reflecting broader societal attitudes towards gender and fashion.

Historically, women's fashion has been oriented towards ornamentation rather than functionality, a view supported by past statements from influential designers like Christian Dior. In Dior's 1954 assertion, he noted that men's pockets serve the practical purpose of holding items, while women's pockets were largely decorative. This long-standing perception has contributed to the design choices in contemporary women's clothing, often deeming pockets as unnecessary or trivial.

Nonetheless, the article highlights an evolution in the perception of pockets in women's fashion, where they have come to symbolize independence, freedom, and empowerment. Pockets in women's clothes have started to be viewed not merely as design features, but rather as a reflection of women's rights and autonomy, hinting at a shift in how fashion accommodates practicality alongside aesthetics.

๐Ÿ“ก Similar Coverage