In an interview with Latvian Television, Dominik Hašek, a former NHL star, voiced his strong discontent with the International Olympic Committee (IOC) over their decision to disqualify Ukrainian athlete Vladislav Heraskevičs. Hašek characterized the decision as a profound disappointment that runs contrary to the values of the Olympic Games. He regards Heraskevičs as a hero for his intention to honor athletes who lost their lives due to the ongoing conflict exacerbated by Russia's imperialist actions. Hašek fervently believes that those who sacrificed their lives for their country deserve recognition and admiration.

Hašek's criticism extends to the IOC's allowance of so-called neutral Russian athletes to participate in the upcoming Milan Olympics. He asserts that this decision continues to propagate the image of aggression tied to Russia, particularly as the country remains engaged in ongoing violence against Ukraine. In his view, allowing these athletes to compete without unequivocal condemnation of Russia's actions undermines the integrity of the Olympic spirit and effectively turns the games into a platform for Russian propaganda.

The implications of Hašek's statements resonate beyond sport, tapping into the larger conversation about the intersection of athletics and global politics. His call to condemn the IOC's position reflects a sentiment echoed by many who believe that sports should not serve as a guise for aggression or a means to whitewash ongoing conflicts. As international sporting events approach, discussions surrounding the participation of athletes from conflict-embroiled nations will likely intensify, challenging the principles of inclusion and representation in competitive sports.