The European Commission is under scrutiny regarding its decision to release €10 billion to Hungary, prompted by a legal opinion stating that the Commission violated its own rules in doing so.
The European Commission is facing calls to retract its decision to allocate €10 billion to Hungary in 2023. This follows the opinion from the Advocate General of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Tamara Čapeta, who argues that the Commission's action contradicts its own established regulations. The recommendation arises after an appeal by the European Parliament, which accused the Commission of breaching its rules when it unblocked funds previously suspended over concerns regarding the rule of law in Hungary.
Members of the European Parliament assert that the decision to release the funds was politically motivated, coinciding with an important EU summit where leaders sought collaboration from Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán regarding support for Ukraine. This claim reflects ongoing tensions within the EU regarding Hungary’s adherence to democratic standards and the implications for EU funding frameworks. The situation underscores the complex interplay of legal, political, and economic dimensions in EU governance.
The opinion provided by the Advocate General is non-binding but often significantly influences the Court's final judgment. A ruling from the Court is anticipated in the coming months, as it could set important precedents not only for Hungary but also for the broader application of EU policies regarding member states’ compliance with the rule of law. The outcome of this case will be closely watched, as it may affect the relationship between EU institutions and member states and shape the future of EU funding policies.
