The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany is comprised of two senates, each consisting of eight judges, who handle oral proceedings and rulings in a visible manner to the public. Beyond this visible aspect, the court also operates through chambers, with each senate hosting three chambers made up of three judges each, facilitating the processing of a significant number of constitutional complaints without oral hearings. This system is essential for managing the heavy workload that the court faces.

A recent case highlighted in the article involves a Palestinian individual from Gaza who filed a constitutional complaint seeking to declare German arms exports to Israel unconstitutional. This complaint was rejected by the Second Chamber of the Second Senate, which underscores the court's mechanisms in handling sensitive international issues. In the absence of an oral hearing, the decisions made are designated as resolutions rather than judgments, illustrating the distinction in the court's procedures.

As the end of the year approaches, both senates of the Federal Constitutional Court reflect on their work and the implications of their decisions, particularly in cases that intersect with international law and human rights. This specific ruling represents not only the court's operations but also its position within the broader discourse on arms exports and constitutional rights within Germany, impacting public perceptions and policy discussions.