The political competition in Iran is marked by a struggle between reformist and conservative currents within a complex system of elected and unelected institutions.
The article discusses the political landscape in Iran, characterized by a significant divide between two major currents: the reformists, who advocate for expanding political and social freedoms through gradual legal changes, and the conservatives who prioritize the protection of the revolution's identity along with security and stability. This dynamic presents both theoretical and practical implications, highlighting the contrasting approaches to governance and civil rights within Iran’s political framework.
The persistent clash between these two currents emerges prominently during key political events such as presidential or parliamentary elections, nuclear negotiations with Western powers, public protests, and debates over the balance of power between government bodies and other influential institutions. Reformists push for adherence to the rule of law and an active role for elected institutions, while conservatives argue for the necessity of political and cultural control to uphold fundamental values.
As the article concludes, this ideological struggle significantly shapes Iran's domestic and foreign policies, influencing diplomatic relations and the socioeconomic conditions of its citizens, as well as the overall stability of the regime.
