WhatsApp denounces that Russia is trying to completely block it to make way for a Russian app
WhatsApp claims that Russian authorities are attempting to fully block the messaging service to promote a local app, MAX, which they describe as a significant regression for users' communication rights.
WhatsApp has reported that Russian authorities are trying to completely block the service in the country, which has over 100 million users, to promote MAX, a state-backed Russian application without privacy guarantees. WhatsApp's criticism centers on the implications for user privacy and safety, suggesting that this move represents a major setback for communication rights in Russia. The application, owned by Meta (Facebook), views this situation as an unfair obstruction of communication for the public, and it asserts that efforts to isolate users could lead to increased vulnerabilities in their security.
The move to block WhatsApp comes shortly after Russia's communications regulator, Roscomnadzor, excluded WhatsApp and other foreign platforms, such as YouTube and independent media outlets, from its permissible list. This intensifying crackdown on foreign communications platforms aligns with Russia's strategy to promote domestic applications that are more controlled and less protective of user privacy. As part of this governmental initiative, authorities are pressuring users to transition to MAX, raising concerns over potential state surveillance and lack of privacy protections that accompany this shift.
WhatsApp continues to assure its users that it is doing everything possible to maintain communication access amid these increasing restrictions. The company emphasizes that the right to secure and private communication is paramount, and the ongoing actions by Russian authorities to limit access to their service could result in serious implications for users' safety and communication freedom in Russia. The situation underscores the broader struggles over digital privacy and state control in the region, reflecting the ongoing tension between authoritarian governance and citizens' rights to free expression.