The article outlines a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy, indicating a move away from the traditional goal of overthrowing hostile regimes through direct military force. It highlights that recent strategies reflect a preference for managing regimes rather than dismantling them, focusing on modifying political behaviors and maintaining state structures. This approach stems from the recognition that dismantling governments often leads to high costs and ineffective outcomes.

The author points out that the contemporary U.S. policy is veering away from the liberal narratives of promoting democracy and integrating countries into market economies, revealing a more pragmatic consideration of interests. The shift emphasizes stability and crisis management over ideological commitments, showing that the U.S. is prepared to engage with existing regimes in a manner that aligns with its strategic goals, even if it means adopting liberal rhetoric without genuine liberal outcomes.

Therefore, this evolution in U.S. policy carries significant implications, as it suggests a recalibration of foreign relations where the U.S. may prioritize stability and control over ideological alignment. The historical context reveals a pattern of starting with non-military pressure that can escalate to military action when necessary, indicating a complex interplay of diplomacy and force in achieving U.S. objectives.