In this article, commentator Joachim Käppner addresses the current political scrutiny faced by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer amidst rumors of potential resignations. He questions whether Starmer should be held accountable for a poor personnel decision or if it is more concerning that President Donald Trump has faced little scrutiny despite his controversial past including connections with problematic figures. The piece argues for a recalibration of the standards applied to politicians, particularly when compared across borders.

Käppner highlights the absurdity in the media's focus on Starmer's choices while Trump, who has had a history of questionable decisions and associations, seems to escape similar pressure for accountability. The commentary is framed against a backdrop of Westminster's political turmoil, referencing resignations within Starmer's team and the increasing pressure for leadership to be held to account for their decisions. This raises questions about fairness and parity in political assessment.

Ultimately, the piece calls for consistency in the expectations of politicians, emphasizing the need for fair criteria when assessing public figures based on their actions. It reflects a growing frustration with the double standards that seem to govern different political landscapes, particularly between the UK and the US, and serves as a larger commentary on democratic accountability and the principles of governance.