The Spanish Senate, led by the Popular Party (PP), plans to bring a unprecedented jurisdictional conflict against Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez to the Constitutional Court. This move marks the first time in Spain's democratic history that such an action will be taken against a sitting president. The urgency for this legal action arose following Sánchez's refusal to appear before a special session on January 29, where he was expected to account for recent railway accidents in Córdoba and Rodalíes. His absence has been perceived as a significant disrespect towards the Senate, especially since it has been 22 months since he last attended a Senate control session.

The decision to proceed with the jurisdictional conflict reflects ongoing tensions between the government and the Senate, underlining a deeper political rift. The PP, as the majority party, argues that Sánchez's avoidance of parliamentary accountability undermines the Senate's constitutional rights, which are designed to ensure governmental transparency and responsibility. They aim to hold him responsible for what they characterize as a pattern of neglect towards parliamentary engagements, aiming to emphasize that such behavior is unacceptable in a democratic framework.

Should the Constitutional Court side with the Senate, this could set a significant precedent in Spanish politics, potentially altering the dynamics between the legislative and executive branches of government. The outcome of this case could also influence public trust in democratic institutions, as citizens watch how elected officials adhere to the principles of accountability and governance. Thus, this decision is not just a procedural matter but also a pivotal moment in the broader discourse of political accountability in Spain.