The report by Polish journalist M. Wiernikowska aimed to present a different image of Russia by showcasing Kaliningrad and its people through her travel blog. Despite not receiving official media permission from local authorities, she utilized professional equipment and filmed interviews with residents, who expressed a sense of pride and claimed that Russia has everything it needs amidst the allegations of a crisis. This portrayal, however, has incited backlash as it seemingly aligns with the Kremlin's propaganda narrative.

One striking element of the report was the inclusion of a map that depicted Crimea as Russian territory, a contentious issue under international law, which recognizes Crimea as part of Ukraine, currently under Russian occupation. This aspect of her coverage reinforces existing Russian claims and serves to legitimize the government's narrative against widespread international condemnation. Many observers point out that Wiernikowska appeared to disregard the propagandistic undertones of her interviews, highlighting the challenges of responsible journalism in politically sensitive areas.

The mixed reception of her report raises questions about the role of journalists in conflict-laden regions and the ethics of portraying a country that is under scrutiny for its actions. While showcasing personal stories can humanize a region, it is also crucial for journalists to acknowledge the broader context and implications of their work, especially regarding narratives that could inadvertently support oppressive regimes.