Feb 12 • 09:58 UTC 🇰🇷 Korea Hankyoreh (KR)

Prosecutors appeal the ruling of '50 billion won Daejangdong' dismissal and acquittal of Kwak Sang-do and his son

Prosecutors have appealed the acquittal and dismissal of charges against former lawmaker Kwak Sang-do and his son related to a 50 billion won payment from Daejangdong development.

In a significant legal development, prosecutors in South Korea have filed an appeal against the first-instance court's dismissal of charges against former lawmaker Kwak Sang-do and his son in connection with a controversial 50 billion won payment linked to the Daejangdong development project. The Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office announced on the 12th that it has reviewed the evidence and legal principles of the original trial verdict, determining that grounds exist for an appeal concerning all defendants. The initial judgment was delivered by the Seoul Central District Court on the 6th, which ruled in favor of both Kwak Sang-do and Kim Man-bae, the chief shareholder of Hwacheon Daeyu Asset Management, dismissing the prosecution's claims of money laundering.

The court previously concluded that the funds attributed to Kwak Sang-do did not constitute bribery, as alleged by prosecutors, leading to both an acquittal for his son and a dismissal of charges against the elder Kwak related to the allegations of breach of the law regulating the concealment of criminal profits. However, following these findings, prosecution authorities have initiated an additional investigation asserting that the money in question was disguised as a performance bonus, leading to fresh charges under the aforementioned law. In the eye of the law, the first trial's judges considered the prosecution's additional indictments as an abuse of prosecutorial power, particularly with respect to Kwak Sang-do's son.

This case has significant implications for political integrity and accountability in South Korea, as the Daejangdong project has already drawn widespread attention and controversy over massive financial transactions and alleged corrupt practices involving public officials. The Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office's decision to appeal stems from concerns regarding the original ruling, which they deem as misunderstanding the facts and legal principles in the case, as well as the necessity for a consolidated review of related unresolved legal issues against Kwak Sang-do and others under the Specific Economic Crimes Act. As this legal battle continues, it underscores the ongoing challenges facing South Korean law enforcement in tackling corruption within high political circles and restoring public trust in the system.

📡 Similar Coverage