Robert Trivers is a controversial American sociobiologist recognized for his provocative statements regarding homosexuality and his public normalization of pedophilia. His name is notably linked to Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted sexual offender and pedophile, who was a close collaborator and financial supporter of Trivers. Recent court documents and electronic correspondence reveal that the relationship between Trivers and Epstein was particularly intimate, further complicating the ethical landscape surrounding Trivers' scientific standing. In 2016, Trivers visited Croatia to speak at scientific gatherings where he discussed evolutionary explanations for homosexuality and homophobia, despite his controversial views.

Trivers' financial connection to Epstein included approximately $40,000 in funding for his research, a fact that Trivers himself acknowledged. In interviews, even after Epstein's conviction, Trivers continued to express support for Epstein, minimizing the latter's criminal actions. This raises serious ethical questions about Trivers' influence in the academic community, especially given his recent engagements in Croatia. His appearances in public forums and contributions to scientific dialogue have prompted debates around the intersection of research funding and morality in the field of sociobiology and ethics.

The implications of Trivers’ connections to Epstein extend beyond individual reputations, raising broader concerns regarding the accountability of scientists who associate with convicted individuals. The Croatian context adds a layer of significance, highlighting how such controversies can impact the local academic landscape and societal norms regarding sensitive subjects, such as sexuality and ethics in scientific research. The discussions surrounding Trivers' visit in Croatia could stimulate public discourse on the responsibilities of researchers in regard to their affiliations and the eventual repercussions of such connections on their work and public perception.