In Zimbabwe, significant public backlash is brewing following the cabinet's endorsement of constitutional amendments aimed at prolonging President Emmerson Mnangagwa's leadership until 2030. These proposed updates are perceived to heavily favor the ruling Zanu-PF party and have sparked fierce criticism from opposition members who label the initiative a "constitutional coup." They argue that any alterations to term limits should require a national referendum to ensure democratic legitimacy.

Legal experts, including Tendai Biti, have articulated that the amendments violate existing constitutional term limits, highlighting the need for two referendums: the first to abolish the term limits and the second to permit the sitting president to gain from such changes. The cabinet’s move indicates a significant shift in Zimbabwe's political landscape, raising alarm about the potential concentration of power and the undermining of democratic processes if such amendments are ratified.

Furthermore, beyond extending the presidential term from five to seven years, the proposed changes would allow parliament, rather than voters, to select the next president. This shift is perceived as a threat to the direct democratic process, igniting discussions on governance and accountability in Zimbabwe. The implications of these amendments resonate beyond the immediate political landscape, as they might affect Zimbabwe's international relations and its citizens' trust in democratic institutions.