The film 'Bribe-giving Pundit' featuring Manoj Bajpayee is currently embroiled in controversy and under review by the Supreme Court of India. During a recent hearing, the Court expressed strong discontent with the title of the film, questioning the filmmaker, Neeraj Pandey, on why he intended to demean a particular segment of society with such terminology. The judges highlighted that the title seems to contravene ethical standards and public order, raising serious ethical concerns about how communities are represented in media.

The Supreme Court's stern directive requires Neeraj Pandey to submit an affidavit clarifying that the film's title 'Bribe-giving Pundit' does not offend or insult any social group. Concurrently, the Court issued notices to the central government and the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) regarding a petition demanding a ban on the film's release on Netflix until these concerns are addressed. This response from the Court emphasizes the responsibility of filmmakers to consider the societal implications of their work.

The outcome of this case could set a significant precedent for how films are titled and marketed in India, particularly with sensitive themes that might affect communal harmony. The implications of the Supreme Court's order underscore the judiciary's role in balancing artistic expression with societal responsibility, reflecting an ongoing dialogue about the representation of communities in the media landscape. As the filmmaker navigates through this legal scrutiny, the film's release remains in limbo until the Court is satisfied with the explanations provided about the portrayal of specific societal segments.