The article criticizes Monsignor Uzinić for his remarks on Stepinac, arguing that the latter should be seen primarily as a symbol of faith rather than a national hero.
The author expresses discomfort in criticizing the words of a bishop, especially during a time of reflection on the figure of Stepinac, whom they regard as a martyr and role model of faith. The piece argues that Stepinac's legacy should not be politicized, emphasizing his courage in opposing ideologies such as Nazism and Communism and asserting the importance of truth. The author challenges the position of Rijeka Archbishop Uzinić, who reportedly suggests that Stepinac's canonization has become a political issue rather than a spiritual one.
The article indicates that the author believes that Stepinac's influence on faith and resilience against totalitarian regimes should be highlighted above all, countering the narrative that views him merely as a national hero. The commentary suggests that there is a division in how Stepinac is perceived within society, particularly in the context of contemporary faith and national identity, and urges a return to understanding his message in a more genuine spiritual context. This critique not only addresses Uzinić's stance but also illuminates broader tensions within the Croatian Catholic Church about the interpretation of historical figures and their relevance today.
By articulating these views, the author positions themselves within a wider discourse about faith, nationalism, and the role of religious leaders in Croatia. The piece raises questions about the implications of redefining historical figures in political terms and emphasizes the need for spiritual integrity in discussions surrounding faith and history.
