In the current era characterized as the Age of Critical Narcissism, the article discusses the phenomenon where individuals feel entitled to share opinions and insights on topics they have not committed time to understanding. This reflects a broader trend of presumed omniscience where casual observers feel they can engage in discussions about specialized activities like curling, despite lacking foundational knowledge or experience. The author compares this casual approach to the rigorous dedication practiced by athletes and experts in the field.

Curling, often seen as a niche sport, requires a level of skill and comprehension that is overlooked by the general public who may only casually watch it for entertainment. The juxtaposition of superficial engagement with the sport and the deep, practice-intensive reality of its players highlights a worrying trend in sports culture and discourse today. The article suggests that this may dilute the appreciation of such sports, transforming them into mere topics of conversation rather than fields of study and passion.

Ultimately, the author calls for a return to valuing expertise and the time invested in truly understanding sports like curling, rather than allowing expert knowledge to be overshadowed by the noise of uninformed commentary. This plea not only pertains to curling but suggests a larger cultural shift that may be necessary across various fields as society grapples with the implications of superficial engagement in complex subjects.