In a recent morning press conference, health authorities led by Zoé Robledo attributed Mexico's declining measles vaccination rates to the failures of past administrations under the PRI and PAN, specifically those of Felipe Calderón, Enrique Peña Nieto, Vicente Fox, and Ernesto Zedillo. Robledo cited that vaccination coverage with the complete two-dose regimen ranged between 47 to 78 percent during these administrations, while noting an improvement to 82-83 percent under President Andrés Manuel López Obrador and Mayor Claudia Sheinbaum. This assertion created controversy given the crucial importance of vaccination rates in preventing outbreaks.

Responding to these allegations, Salomón Chertorivski, who served as Health Secretary during Calderón's presidency, took to the stage to challenge the validity of Robledo's data, declaring that the dishonesty behind these statements did not surprise him. He emphasized the responsibility of each government in addressing the health needs of the population, rather than simply shifting blame. Chertorivski's objections highlight ongoing tensions between current health officials and their predecessors, reflecting a deeper political struggle over accountability in public health management.

The dispute over measles vaccination rates not only underscores the challenges faced in public health policy but also signals the political stakes involved in the perception of health administration effectiveness. As officials grapple with the resurgence of measles cases, the need for a united approach to vaccination efforts becomes urgent. This incident underscores the political narratives that often complicate public health discussions, as historical performance is weighed against current achievements, all in the public eye.