The article delves into the recent uproar surrounding Natalia Beauty's admission of using artificial intelligence in her writing process, which has sparked a nostalgic critique of manual effort among readers of Folha. The discussion raises questions about the legitimacy of authorship and the value placed on personal labor in creative processes, with some arguing that reliance on AI diminishes the authenticity of the writer's journey. This debate reflects a larger historical context where the pursuit of 'pure' authorship has often been co-opted by nostalgic notions of originality and effort.

Historically, the discomfort with collaborative or assisted writing isn't a new phenomenon. The author points out that in the 19th century, even esteemed authors like Victor Hugo and Alexandre Dumas were known to employ assistants and researchers to bolster their productivity. This sheds light on the flawed perception that true authors must labor alone, exposing a hypocritical stance in the literary community that often overlooks its own reliance on collaborative efforts in favor of upholding a mythos of solitary genius.

The implications of this discussion extend beyond literary circles, challenging contemporary writers to rethink the definitions of authorship in the age of technological intervention. This anxiety surrounding the role of AI in writing reflects a broader cultural ambivalence toward technology, where innovation is often met with nostalgia and skepticism. Ultimately, the article encourages a reevaluation of what constitutes authentic writing, and whether the tools used should overshadow the ideas communicated, urging readers to reflect on their perceptions of artistry in a rapidly evolving digital landscape.