In Brazil, a group of judicial associations, comprising judges, public defenders, and members of public accounts tribunals, has submitted a request to Minister Flávio Dino of the Supreme Federal Court (STF) to contribute to a legal action that scrutinizes the so-called 'penduricalhos' in public service. These perks are additional payments that public servants, including judges, receive alongside their salaries but are not explicitly established by law, thus circumventing the public sector salary ceiling of R$ 46,366.19. The entities emphasize that these benefits are essential for maintaining the motivation and effectiveness of public servants.

Recently, Minister Dino ruled to suspend these perks across the three branches of government, prompting the judicial associations to argue for their reinstatement. They have also filed a declaration appeal to clarify aspects of Dino's decision. The debate around 'penduricalhos' is increasingly pressing, as these additional earnings, such as fuel allowances and premium licenses, raise serious questions about fiscal responsibility and equity within the public administration.

The outcome of this legal challenge could significantly impact the structure of public compensation and may signal broader implications for public governance in Brazil. If the Supreme Court upholds the suspension of such perks, it could lead to a more stringent application of the existing salary cap regulations, thereby reshaping how public servants are compensated in the long term.