The issue of disarming Hamas has returned to the forefront of political discussions, particularly as the United States views it as essential for the reconstruction of Gaza. This perspective highlights the broader implications for the region's stability and the expectations for 'the next day' following any potential resolution. Political analyst Iyad Al-Qurra notes that while Hamas does not categorically reject the discussion of its arms, it opposes disarmament under Israeli terms without reciprocal commitments, which raises questions about the feasibility of a genuine negotiation process.

Al-Qurra criticizes what he sees as selective negotiations by Israel, focusing only on the weapons of the resistance while ignoring Israel's violations of the initial ceasefire agreement, such as ending targeted assassinations, reopening border crossings, and ensuring the flow of humanitarian aid. This unilateral approach tends to exacerbate tensions rather than foster an environment conducive to peace. He emphasizes that the current situation does not constitute real negotiations, but rather reflects Israel's strategic interests.

Moreover, reports have surfaced indicating that Israel has communicated to Washington the necessity of conducting additional military operations in Gaza to align with the vision of former President Donald Trump regarding the region. The backdrop of the ongoing conflict, as noted by Al-Qurra, reveals that a war lasting nearly two years has significantly weakened resistance capabilities, suggesting a complex and dangerous cycle of violence that continues to evolve without clear resolutions.