The Board of Peace, established last year through a UN resolution with the aim of focusing on a peace plan for Gaza, is now facing significant backlash from influential democracies. Many countries, including key US allies such as France, Germany, the UK, and Canada, are reportedly opting out of its first meeting due to concerns that the Board could become a vehicle for Donald Trump to impose US interests internationally. This perception raises alarms about the potential for undermining collaborative efforts in global governance and diplomacy.

Critics argue that the Board of Peace's structure, which seemingly grants Trump extensive powers, undermines multilateral engagement and could lead to greater tensions within international relations. These nations are wary of what they see as a unilateral approach to global peace-making that could prioritize American interests over collaborative global efforts. The schism highlights the delicate balance international leaders must maintain in engaging with US foreign policy initiatives while safeguarding their own national interests.

As the Board's inaugural meeting approaches, the absence of major democratic players showcases a growing distrust in Trump's foreign policy strategy. This trend could not only hamper the Board's efficacy but also reflect broader concerns regarding the future of international cooperation in addressing complex global issues such as conflict resolution, climate change, and human rights. The reluctance of democracies to participate signals a potential shift in how America is perceived on the global stage, especially under Trump's administration.