In the recent legal proceedings surrounding the Goleada case, Gastón Aparicio L. C., one of the detainees, has requested the nullification of his detention, contesting the legality of the proceedings against him and ten other individuals. He asserts that they were completely unaware of any investigation that had been launched against them by the Fiscalía, which relates to organized crime, money laundering, and tax fraud. His claims highlight significant concerns regarding due process and the notifications required in legal investigations.

Aparicio's legal team argues that their clients were never formally or materially informed of the initiation of the criminal investigation, which constitutes a breach of their rights. Moreover, they emphasize that the detainees were not given an opportunity to present their side of the story, as the prosecution did not receive their versions of events. This neglect is presented as a violation of fundamental defense rights, shedding light on procedural flaws in how the investigation is being handled.

The case raises important issues about transparency and justice within the Ecuadorian legal system, particularly in how law enforcement and judicial authorities conduct investigations. The detainees argue that they were not adequately prepared to address the allegations against them, which could have serious implications for their legal outcomes. With increasing scrutiny of corruption-related crimes in Ecuador, this case may set a precedent for how similar future cases are treated in terms of suspects' rights and legal protections.