Valdemaras Rupšys, the former commander of the Lithuanian armed forces, is currently facing questioning in a case related to the alleged misappropriation of funds concerning medical implants. He initially opted to remain silent at the beginning of the trial, indicating that he would only speak after all witnesses have been heard. This decision reflects a strategy often employed by defendants who wish to evaluate the prosecution's case before making their own statements. The Vilnius District Court has now commenced the procedural steps of questioning him, as confirmed by court spokeswoman Lina Nemeikaitė on Wednesday. Rupšys's denial of guilt suggests that he aims to contest the charges vigorously. The outcomes of these proceedings could have significant implications for Rupšys, particularly considering his previous high-ranking position within the armed forces of Lithuania. As the case unfolds, it is expected to garner considerable media attention due to the prominence of the individual involved and the nature of the allegations. The legal proceedings could highlight issues related to military accountability and transparency in government-related expenditures, potentially prompting broader discussions about ethics in public service and accountability in the Lithuanian defense sector.