The legal advisor to the Knesset's Constitution Committee, Guy Blay, has issued a warning regarding the government's move to define the characteristics of the proposed political investigation committee. He argues that such a decision may jeopardize the very reasons for establishing the committee, particularly the goal of truth-seeking. In a preparatory document circulated ahead of a discussion on the bill, Blay stated that whoever determines the scope of the investigation—what will be investigated and what will not—can influence the outcome of the inquiry even before it begins. This brings into question the independence and integrity of the investigation process, as defined by the proposed legislation.

Blay's document specifically critiques sections of the legislation that deal with minimum requirements for committee members, such as Israeli citizenship and security clearance. He elaborates on why the Knesset stipulates that a sitting or former judge should chair a state investigative committee, highlighting that while there are drawbacks to appointing a judge, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. The emphasis on abiding by these rules is essential to ensure a credible investigation that can earn widespread trust from both the coalition and the opposition in the Knesset.

Moreover, the anticipated changes to the original proposal may lead to complications regarding the committee's establishment and function, particularly concerning the removal of the requirement for a judge to lead the committee. Blay's analysis raises significant concerns about whether this will dilute the investigative process, potentially leading to a politicized outcome not aligned with the intended impartiality of the committee. The discussion is expected to spark significant debate within the Knesset, reflecting broader concerns about political accountability and transparency in government operations.