The avocado and the greasy smoke
A recent social media post by Greek politician Efi Achtsioglou sparked a wave of moral panic against veganism, drawing extreme reactions and discussions about its association with individualism and political ideologies.
Efi Achtsioglou, a parliamentarian from the Greek Left, ignited a significant backlash against veganism with a social media post linking it to Trumpism. Her assertion that 'veganism and Trumpism do not go together' drew intense and varied reactions across social media platforms, suggesting a sense of alarm around the growing influence of Trumpian politics compared to veganism. Critics, including online commentators, made extreme claims ranging from suggesting that veganism is politically naïve to unfounded assertions about historical figures like Hitler, further complicating the discourse surrounding the dietary practice.
The reactions highlighted a common thread of hostility towards veganism, often supported by vehement ideological rhetoric. Detractors labeled vegans as self-centered individuals focused solely on personal health and longevity, dismissing the ethical considerations underlying veganism. They projected a stereotype of the vegan as a neoliberal 'autistic monster' who makes bizarre and hypocritical consumer choices, ignoring broader social and environmental implications of dietary habits.
This backlash reflects deeper societal tensions regarding dietary choices and their connections to identity politics. As veganism becomes more mainstream, the pushback may signal resistance from traditionalists who feel threatened by shifts in consumption norms and values. The debate raises questions not only about the ethical considerations of food but also about the political landscape in a polarized environment, suggesting that dietary choices are increasingly viewed through a partisan lens, complicating discussions about health, ethics, and sustainability.