Iranian President: 'Great Sadness' from Suppression… Apology at Home, Dialogue Abroad
Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian expressed regret over the violent suppression of anti-government protests while reaffirming the country's commitment to nuclear negotiations.
In a recent speech on the anniversary of the Islamic Revolution, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian made a rare public apology regarding the violent crackdown on anti-government protests that have led to significant casualties. He described the government's response to the protests, which escalated following the economic crisis starting in December, as a source of 'great sadness'. While he refrained from directly referencing the government's actions, his remarks conveyed a sense of responsibility towards the victims of the violence, emphasizing that the authorities do not seek confrontation with the populace. However, he also criticized the protests as influenced by 'Western propaganda'.
The protests, which began over the devaluation of the Iranian rial and economic hardships, have seen escalating violence, with official figures suggesting over 3,100 deaths, while estimates indicate the number could be as high as 30,000. Pezeshkian's comments reflect an attempt to address internal discontent while maintaining a critical stance against foreign influences. His focus on expressing regret highlights the Iranian government's acknowledgment of the unrest, even as it continues to assert its narrative against external adversaries.
On the nuclear front, President Pezeshkian emphasized that Iran is not seeking nuclear weapons and is prepared for any verification regarding its nuclear program. However, he firmly stated that Iran would not succumb to excessive demands from Western nations, stressing a commitment to dialogue with neighboring countries aimed at achieving regional peace and stability. He highlighted the ongoing nuclear negotiations with the United States, pointing to a need to overcome distrust stemming from past Western actions. Pezeshkian's statements suggest a careful balancing act of addressing domestic pressures while signaling an openness to international diplomatic efforts, specifically regarding Iran's strategic nuclear ambitions.