In a significant legal development, the Prosecutor's Office and the State Attorney's Office in Spain are advocating for amnesty for Carles Puigdemont, the former president of Catalonia, concerning his criminal charges for embezzlement arising from the 2017 illegal referendum. They have submitted a request to the Constitutional Court to support Puigdemont's appeal against the Supreme Court's ruling that denied the amnesty for these charges. This move aligns the state legal institutions with Puigdemont's stance and reflects a broader trend in Catalonia's ongoing quest for political and legal resolutions following the independence referendum.

The case references the 2017 referendum on Catalonia's independence from Spain, which the Spanish government deemed illegal. Puigdemont and other key figures, including former Vice President Oriol Junqueras and other councilors, have faced legal repercussions as a result. The Supreme Court's refusal to grant amnesty is perceived by the Prosecutor's Office as a violation of Puigdemont's right to effective judicial protection, underlining ongoing tensions in Spain regarding Catalonia's independence and autonomy. The stance taken by these legal authorities may signal a potential shift in how the Spanish judiciary could handle similar cases in the future.

The implications of this situation extend beyond the legal realm into the political landscape of Spain, where Catalonia's independence movement remains a contentious issue. Should the Constitutional Court side with Puigdemont, it could set a precedent that might reshape the legal consequences of political actions taken in the pursuit of autonomy. This development is crucial as it not only impacts Puigdemont and those connected to the 2017 events but also ultimately reflects on the relationship between Catalonia and the Spanish state, which continues to grapple with the repercussions of the independence movement.