The report by journalist Maria Wiernikowska, aired on Channel Zero, has stirred controversy as both she and the channel's head, Krzysztof Stanowski, face backlash for the content presented. Critics argue that the report portrays Russia positively and seeks to absolve Russian President Vladimir Putin of his criminal actions. This sentiment has been echoed by the Ukrainian embassy, which objected to a graphic that unlawfully shows Crimea as part of Russia, igniting further outrage in Ukraine and among international observers.

In the aftermath of the report, Russian propaganda outlets, notably the Kremlin-affiliated RIA Novosti, expressed approval for the portrayal of daily life in Russia as shown in Wiernikowska's work. This endorsement by a pro-Kremlin agency raises concerns over the potential dissemination of pro-Russian narratives in Polish media. The incident has sparked intense debate about media responsibility and the influence of propaganda on public perception, particularly regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.

Krzysztof Stanowski, defending the report, released a statement asserting that showcasing everyday life in Kaliningrad is not an act of propaganda but an attempt to present a realistic depiction of the country. This defense highlights the complex nature of media narratives in times of conflict, where the line between journalism and propaganda can become blurred, and raises critical questions about the ethical responsibilities of media organizations in shaping public opinion about international issues.