The chairman of the Lithuanian Farmers and Greens Union (LVŽS) remarked positively on the ruling parties' response to the European Parliament's (EP) resolution concerning the Lithuanian National Radio and Television (LRT). He stated that just as one parliament can express its opinion, it is reasonable for the Lithuanian Parliament to respond. He emphasized the importance of open debate among parliaments, affirming that such exchanges are a normal part of parliamentary democracy. This view contrasts with some critiques, suggesting that national issues should not be contested at an international level.

In January, the EP adopted a resolution addressing perceived threats to democracy in Lithuania, particularly relating to the attempts to control public broadcasting. This resolution drew significant attention and criticism from various political segments within Lithuania, prompting discussions on whether national-level matters should be resolved independently of European legislative feedback. The LVŽS chairman defended the notion of national parliaments asserting their rights and opinions, characterizing the initiative as a healthy expression of democratic dialogue, despite contrasting opinions regarding the legitimacy and implications of such debates.

The discourse surrounding the EP's resolution and the Lithuanian Parliament's right to respond reflects broader tensions within EU politics, especially concerning national sovereignty versus collective European engagement in member states' democratic processes. As Lithuanian politicians navigate this debate, the outcomes may influence not only internal political dynamics but also Lithuania's relationship with the EU regarding its democratic integrity and public broadcasting independence.