Feb 11 • 07:00 UTC 🇫🇮 Finland Yle Uutiset

The list of savings in social services from Kaisa Juuso's working group is published - the savings target cannot be reached without weakening services

A working group led by Finland's Minister of Social Affairs and Health, Kaisa Juuso, has announced that achieving the proposed 100 million euros in annual savings in social services is impossible without compromising the quality of these services.

A working group established by Finland's Minister of Social Affairs and Health, Kaisa Juuso, has released its final report regarding proposed savings in social services. Despite the goal of achieving annual savings of 100 million euros, the report indicates that the working group could only propose changes amounting to approximately 50 million euros, suggesting that further cuts could jeopardize service quality. The group explored various avenues for savings, including streamlining documentation processes, consolidating services, and reducing client planning, all aimed at minimizing the impact on client rights and services.

The working group's mandate included identifying measures to achieve a 50 million euro reduction in state funding for welfare areas by 2027, with a second reduction of another 50 million euros beginning in 2028. However, the report concludes that reaching these targets is unattainable without significant detrimental effects on the quality of social services provided to the public. The discussion comes at a time when the Finnish government is under pressure to implement budget cuts while maintaining essential public services effectively.

The findings of the working group will contribute to the government's upcoming proposal for reforms in social services, which is expected to be submitted to the Finnish Parliament this autumn. This situation highlights the ongoing challenges faced by policymakers in balancing fiscal restraint with the need for high-quality social services, indicating that the government must reconsider its approach if it wishes to meet budgetary goals without adversely affecting public welfare.

📡 Similar Coverage