The article reflects on the historical case of Enzo Tortora in the context of a current television series by Marco Bellocchio, suggesting that it brings to light the debate about separating the careers of magistrates in Italy. It argues that, had this separation been in place, it might have altered the outcome of Tortora's trial, where he was unjustly condemned despite clear evidence of his innocence. The piece emphasizes the interplay between the media and the judiciary during this period, noting that the media's rush to judgment played a significant role in Tortora's conviction.

The author points out that during the trial, the prosecution and the media behaved almost as conspirators, with the press celebrating Tortora's conviction without adequately investigating the facts. It highlights that one journalist, Vittorio Feltri, took the initiative to examine the evidence and quickly discovered inconsistencies that pointed to Tortora's innocence. This situation underscores the failure of the judicial system to uphold justice, where public opinion and media sensationalism overshadowed the truth.

In conclusion, the article argues for the importance of reevaluating the relationship between the media and the justice system, advocating for reforms that would prevent such miscarriages of justice from occurring in the future. By drawing parallels between the past and present, it highlights the urgent need for safeguards that ensure fair trials, thereby instigating a broader discussion on legal reforms in Italy.