A recent hearing by the White House's religious freedom committee focused on the contentious issue of anti-Semitism and its intersection with criticism of Israel. The session became particularly heated when committee member Kari Boller challenged the notion that criticism of Israel or Zionism should automatically be considered anti-Semitic. She posed provocative questions that highlighted her stance, such as whether Catholic opposition to Zionism was indicative of anti-Semitism, a viewpoint that has been met with considerable tension among the attendees. During the proceedings, witnesses included individuals who contended that anti-Zionism equates to anti-Semitism according to established definitions. In a pointed exchange, a rabbi also stated that denying Israel's right to exist represents both a contradiction and anti-Semitism. In response, Boller declared her Catholic faith and maintained that she does not view modern Israel in any prophetic religious light, illustrating her position on the matter. The recorded segment from the hearing quickly gained traction on American social media platforms, with a significant divide in public opinion. Many applauded Boller's bold inquiries as a defense of free speech, while others criticized her statements for denying the serious implications of anti-Semitism. This incident reflects the ongoing complexities surrounding discussions of freedom of expression in relation to Jewish identity and supports for Israel, further fueling the larger cultural discourse in the United States regarding anti-Semitism and criticism of Israel.