In the article, Leszek Kieliszewski reflects on the nearly thirty-year history of Poland's criminal code, which has undergone 128 amendments, averaging slightly over one revision per quarter. The pace of amendments has varied, with a notable spike in 2017 when nine changes were made in response to heightened public and media attention on certain types of crime. Recently, the focus has shifted to combating road traffic offenders, highlighting how public discourse often dictates legislative priorities.

Kieliszewski questions the definition of a 'criminal,' pointing out that when asked about their identity, people typically refer to their professions or societal roles instead of labeling themselves as criminals. He argues that the term 'criminal' is often assigned by others, sometimes inaccurately or without consideration of context, leading to a stigmatized view that can affect individuals for life. This raises important questions about the societal implications of labeling and the possible disconnect between legal definitions and personal identity.

The discussion also touches on how these legal and cultural perceptions contribute to a broader dialogue about justice and societal norms. By critically examining the way society treats offenders and the legal framework that governs these identities, Kieliszewski invites readers to reflect on the impact of such designations on individuals' lives and the potential for rehabilitation versus punishment. The article serves as both a critique of the legal reforms in Poland and a philosophical inquiry into the nature of crime and identity.