Feb 11 • 04:00 UTC 🇮🇹 Italy Il Giornale

Trump abolishes Obama’s green science (and turns off Cuba)

Donald Trump is poised to abolish a significant scientific discovery from the Obama era, marking a potential radical step back in the fight against climate change in the United States.

Donald Trump is preparing to eliminate a historic scientific finding from the Obama administration, which could represent one of the most drastic setbacks in the United States' efforts to combat climate change. According to sources from the Wall Street Journal, the U.S. administration is set to repeal a regulation this week that serves as the legal foundation for federal-level emissions regulation, under the banner of 'deregulation.' At the center of this move is the 2009 'endangerment finding' that identified six greenhouse gases as a threat to public health and welfare, which has informed the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) standards for limiting emissions from power plants and tightening fuel economy standards under the Clean Air Act.

Officials from the Trump administration have indicated that the final rule will eliminate regulatory requirements for measuring and reporting these emissions, a decision that could significantly weaken federal oversight of air quality and the nation's commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. This radical policy shift comes amid an already contentious political climate regarding environmental regulations, given the ongoing debates about the impact of climate change and the measures that should be taken to address it.

This action not only affects environmental policy but also poses broader implications for U.S. standing in international climate discussions, particularly as other nations continue to move forward with climate initiatives. By undermining the regulatory framework established during the Obama era, Trump’s administration risks igniting further backlash from environmentalists and could complicate efforts to enact meaningful climate action in the future. Furthermore, this decision may also reflect the administration’s prioritization of short-term economic interests over long-term environmental sustainability, a stance that could have lasting consequences for both domestic and global environmental health.

📡 Similar Coverage