Eve Soostari, a prosecutor from the Northern Circuit Prosecutor's Office in Estonia, faces serious charges of professional forgery and the use of forged documents. According to the allegations presented by the prosecution's oversight department, Soostari manipulated the contents of a criminal case file in the fall of 2024 by altering the previously stated position of the victim's representative. This modification was made while preparing a new consent form for plea negotiations, despite the representative's explicit indication that they did not agree to such negotiations. To further complicate matters, Soostari is accused of destroying the original form that indicated the victim's representative's refusal to enter into a plea agreement.

As per the prosecution's report, Soostari not only modified the filing but also unlawfully supplemented the plaintiff's petition by adding the name of the defendant by hand. After these alterations, she forwarded the criminal case to the Harju County Court, aiming to facilitate the continuation of the proceedings under plea negotiations and the settlement of civil claims without seeking further clarifications from the victim. This case raises significant concerns about ethical standards in prosecutorial conduct, emphasizing the critical need for trust in legal processes.

The fundamental principle of the prosecutor's office hinges on maintaining public trust, and the alleged forgery of procedural documents constitutes a severe breach of professional integrity. As the case unfolds, it serves as a stark reminder of the consequences of unethical behavior within the legal system and the importance of accountability for those in positions of authority.