In an ongoing debate about nuclear power in Norway, Kjetil B. Alstadheim, the political editor of Aftenposten, argues that nuclear energy is impossible in Norway without subsidies and that the country does not need it due to its abundance of hydropower. This assertion has raised questions about Alstadheim's understanding of the arguments presented by economics professor Atle Guttormsen, who has criticized the assumptions in Alstadheim's analysis regarding energy solutions.

Guttormsen contends that if Alstadheim had fully engaged with his work, he would appreciate the limitations of land-based power expansion and the potential of nuclear energy as a viable alternative, particularly as new technologies, such as small modular reactors, can operate under different financial models that do not rely on government support. The dialogue highlights the contention around the necessity and feasibility of nuclear power in Norway's energy landscape, especially in the context of emerging competitors like offshore wind energy, which is becoming increasingly cost-effective.

This conversation reflects broader trends and considerations regarding energy security in Norway and across Europe. With potential private investments and market-driven models becoming more prominent, there is a growing belief that the traditional views on subsidies and energy necessity may be evolving, possibly allowing for nuclear energy to play a more prominent role in the future energy mix, especially considering Norway's climate and energy requirements.