In a recent article, readers of Folha expressed their opinions on the tribute paid to President Lula by a samba school in Brazil. The discussion centers around the legitimacy of such tributes during election periods, with some readers highlighting a perceived double standard. One reader pointed out that if a samba school were to honor a family member of a political opponent, it would likely be met with legal challenges, indicating a belief that the Brazilian justice system is biased in favor of the government.

Another reader emphasized the importance of equality and democracy, arguing that while they support Lula, they are in favor of fair treatment regardless of political affiliation. They questioned whether oversight authorities are doing their job when it comes to perceived early electoral campaigning, indicating concerns over the equitability of political support in public events. The sentiment here reflects broader anxieties about the integrity of electoral processes and public institutions in Brazil, especially in the context of the country's polarized political landscape.

Finally, a different perspective emerged with a reader defending the legal standing of Janja, Lula's wife, participating in the samba procession, claiming that the law does not prohibit her involvement as long as she does not solicit votes. This argument suggests a divide among the public on what constitutes acceptable behavior within the realm of political support and public funding, showcasing an ongoing debate about the balance between celebration and political campaigning in samba culture and Brazilian politics.