The double game of Delcy: frees prisoners only to arrest them at home and delays the Amnesty Law
In a controversial move, Venezuelan authorities have reportedly released political prisoners only to place them under house arrest, generating national outrage.
The political landscape in Venezuela has been thrown into turmoil as the government, under the leadership of Delcy Rodriguez, has made headlines for their contradictory approach to political prisoners. In a shocking turn of events late Sunday night, key opposition leader Juan Pablo Guanipa was re-arrested just six hours after his release, highlighting a pattern of manipulation and control by the ruling chavista regime. This incident not only impacted Guanipa's personal freedom but also dashed the hopes of many Venezuelans who were experiencing renewed optimism with the recent prisoner releases.
The situation escalated further as Guanipa was taken back to his home in Maracaibo, where he had been living in hiding since August 2024. This tactic, referred to by the chavistas as 'house arrest', is seen as a way to stifle dissent while giving the illusion of political leniency. Alongside the imposition of an electronic ankle bracelet, Guanipa was ordered to maintain silence, with police stationed outside his home, ensuring that any further moves against the regime would be met with immediate repercussions. The government's actions have instilled a palpable fear among citizens, as expressed by Guanipa's family, emphasizing that fear has become a commanding force in society.
This double game raises significant questions about the sincerity of the government's intentions in implementing the Amnesty Law. As the law continues to be delayed, many wonder if this tactic is merely a facade to placate international observers while consolidating power domestically. The efforts to control influential opposition figures like Guanipa signal a troubling continuation of authoritarian practices, leaving Venezuelans with a sense of uncertainty about their political future and the very real implications of government policies on personal freedoms.