The economist opened Russia's wounds: 'The occupied territories are draining the last drops of blood from the Kremlin'
An economist discusses why, even if Russia were to conquer Donbas, it would result in no benefits for the Kremlin and only harm for Russia itself.
The article features insights from an economist who analyzes the implications of Russia's potential conquest of the Donbas region. Despite the significant military efforts that would be required to seize and hold such territories, the expert argues that the Kremlin would gain little to no economic advantage from these actions. Instead, the occupied territories would act as a burden that drains Russia's resources and stifles its economy further.
The metaphor of a 'suitcase without a handle' is employed to illustrate the dilemma faced by Russia regarding the Donbas and other captured regions. These territories provide no economic wealth or resources, yet their maintenance and military control require substantial investments, akin to carrying an oversized burden without the means to utilize it effectively. This situation highlights the ongoing challenges faced by the Kremlin as it seeks to maintain control over these areas while struggling with the economic realities at home.
The implications of this analysis suggest that rather than achieving strategic victories, Russia's actions may lead to further self-inflicted harm. As the economist posits, the effort to sustain and exploit these regions may be more detrimental to Russia's national interests, leading to a potential re-evaluation of its military and occupation strategies in the context of long-term sustainability and economic viability.