The recent transfer of José de San Martín's sabre has reignited a long-standing debate in Argentina about the historical significance and custodianship of this national symbol. Manuela Rosas, the daughter of Juan Manuel de Rosas, played a crucial role in this narrative when she decided to donate the sword to Argentina during her exile in England, alongside her husband Máximo Terrero. This act was formalized in a document that not only brought the sword back to the country but also imposed a binding condition on its custody, stating that the "final depositary" must be the National Historical Museum.

This mandate has become the focal point in a legal dispute concerning the sword’s transfer, particularly among the heirs who have called upon Rosas's stipulation in their arguments. The historical significance of Manuela Rosas has also resurfaced, shedding light on her substantial role in the country’s narrative. Her decision to return the sword was not just an act of goodwill but a complex legacy of national pride intertwined with legal obligations that continue to be relevant today.

The ongoing debate encapsulates broader themes of historical memory and national identity, particularly regarding symbolic artifacts. The situation surrounding San Martín's sword demonstrates how history can shape contemporary discussions and legal frameworks, revealing the enduring impact of figures like Manuela Rosas who have influenced Argentina's path and the preservation of its heritage.